Jun
06
2008

Display Ads – Advantages & Disadvantages

Display ads, which combine text, images, and animation (but are not interactive – those are rich media ) to convey a message, are usually more economical than rich media ads, but have some advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages

  • Cheap – Although placing an ad on top websites can cost thousands of dollars a month, prices are usually cheaper for display ads than for rich media ads (due to costs in creating, hosting, and annoyance factors).
  • Easy to Create – Static display ads (jpg, gif, sometimes png) can easily be created in most free graphics programs (or that program for digital photos that came on your computer). Even animated display ads can be created using free and low cost software. Creating good display ads requires a bit of design and marketing knowledge.
  • Attention – Ads placed within a block of content are more likely to be clicked on (especially if the ad is related to the content). Medium rectangle ads (300×250) are especially effective in content.
  • Basic – With little complexity display ads are fairly easy to understand in terms of creation, placement and analytics, making them a great place to start for beginners.

Disadvantages

  • Ignored – Ads placed on the side or page in “traditional” ad spots tend to be ignored (because people know that they are ads without paying attention to them – especially if they are animated).
  • Blocked – As with most ads which are served from an ad server, display ads may be blocked by viewers who either turn off scripting in their browser or have some other type of software that blocks ads (there are some ways that ad servers try to get around this – more on that in a future post).
  • Limited – Display ads are limited in the amount of information they can convey. Even with animation you usually only have 10-15 seconds of time to get your message across in a limited space.
  • Little Information – Information collected about display ads is usually limited to impressions, clicks and possibly some information about who clicked on the ad (if the site has registration tied to their ad serving – more on analytics in a future post).

While display ads have some limitations, they are a great way to start advertising. Display ads in content are the best bang-for-your-buck to advertise your business. (See also Types of Online Advertising)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Jun
04
2008

How do your ads get served online?

Banner ads, skyscrapers, tile ads, house ads, button ads, rich media ads, peel aways, interstitials, video, text, contextual, ad infinitum. We have all seen enough online ads to have become numb to their presence. Advertisements are an inescapable part of our online experience. But have you ever thought about how that ad got to you in the first place? The mechanics of how advertisements get delivered online can illuminate many mysteries about how and why the online advertisement industry works the way that they do.

In a series starting this week I will attempt to demystify some of the voodoo that goes on behind the scenes. First we will look at the language of the browser, JavaScript. We will try to defang the notoriously prickly scripting language just enough to peek inside. Then we will look at what an ad hosting service can bring to the table when we review Ad Juggler. Finally, we will discuss Googles Ad Sense and try to come up with good ways to use it to promote your business marketing campaign.

Jun
03
2008

Interview with Greg Hochmuth, Creator and CEO of Mento

mentoMento, now in public beta, is a link-sharing and tagging website, similar to Del.icio.us or Pownce, with expanded functionality to create conversations around the link sharing. Creator and CEO Greg Hochmuth took a few minutes to explain how Mento is different and to share his vision for business users. Look for an upcoming Sazbean review of Mento. Greg was kind enough to provide a number of invites to Mento for our readers. [Read more...]

Jun
02
2008

Google – Good Software Overcomes Bad Hardware

Webware.com has an article on the technology behind the search superpower Google. The article covered a presentation by Jeff Dean in the 2008 Google IO conference. Google is somewhat famous for having shunned conventional wisdom a bit by building their empire on throw-away hardware. Quoting the article:

In each cluster’s first year, it’s typical that 1,000 individual machine failures will occur; thousands of hard drive failures will occur; one power distribution unit will fail, bringing down 500 to 1,000 machines for about 6 hours; 20 racks will fail, each time causing 40 to 80 machines to vanish from the network; 5 racks will “go wonky,” with half their network packets missing in action; and the cluster will have to be rewired once, affecting 5 percent of the machines at any given moment over a 2-day span, Dean said. And there’s about a 50 percent chance that the cluster will overheat, taking down most of the servers in less than 5 minutes and taking 1 to 2 days to recover

For most any other company, that would have been a very unhappy story. Yet for smart companies like Google, getting service reliability without reliable hardware is part of the advantage. All of these outages are handled skillfully by Google software. Its the software that redirects queries around these outages, distributing the work across hundreds of servers all at once. The little Network Engineer in me is screaming ‘That’s what I’m talking about!’ That isn’t just fully redundant, that’s approaching biological complexity. The brain’s software can do some amazing things despite the hardware being unreliable. Does that then imply that the google search service has reached phone company levels of availability? A hint might be in their next big engineering hurdle; Datacenter to Datacenter switching of jobs, seemlessly. In otherwords, one big Namespace.

Technorati Tags: , ,