• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sazbean

Software Development Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
You are here: Home / Archives for Aaron Worsham

Aaron Worsham

Aaron Worsham / Apr 14, 2008

Customer Communications 2.0 – Instant Messaging

Previously, we chatted about forms of communications and how they’re changing in the b2b world. Today we will glance casually at what Instant Messaging has to offer your company. IM isn’t the new kid on the communication block anymore; its actually starting to show its age. Most IMs are old enough and mature enough to consider for more serious jobs than passing on jokes to friends and co-workers. While MySpace and Facebook are hanging around at the mall in the food court, AIM, Yahoo Messenger, MSN and Jabber have all moved on to full time jobs in the retail and services industries. They have become responsible, productive members of society. Now the question is, how do we put them to best use. The key to understanding how IM can help you connect with your customers are ‘immediacy’ and ‘presence’. Lets do a little catagorizing, shall we?

Talking to someone face to face has immediacy and presence. You know they are there and that they are hearing you as you talk. The big downside is max distance being measured in feet. Also, face to face conversations are best done serially. You can have more than one conversation at a time, but the results are lousy and sometimes dangerous (me agreeing to Opera tickets with wife while talking to buddy about Hockey Playoff seats)

Phone conversations, too, have immediacy and presence. The distance problem is solved, but concurrency is still an issue. A good salesman might be able to hold two sales calls a once but I wouldn’t recommend it to the rest of us.

Along came email, which was a glorified post office with the new fangled ability of immediate delivery. Suddenly everyone was hooked. Communication through an immediate delivery that didn’t rely on presence was just the ticket for huge gains in efficiency. Digital records of the communication thread was the killer feature that cinched it. This became the defacto standard for business communication. Still, when something needs presence we fall back to the phone.

Now compare Instant Messaging. IM has the distance, presence and immediacy of a phone call. It has the efficiency and cocurrency of email by holding multiple conversations. It also has digital recordings of the communication thread. Its something of the perfect business communication tool, if only it didn’t suffer from an image problem.

In a few years your customers will start to host IM solutions for their company, as they do email today. Here is how you can put this information to use now to build stronger lines of communication. First, you need to get a corporate IM service. Each have their strenghts and reputations in the market. For a solution hosted at your location, I would recommend looking at Jabber. Now, extend this service to your customers as an alternative to email. For some customers, this will have instant geek chic appeal. Here is where knowing the weaknesses of the different forms of communication makes a huge difference. Hook up support staff with IM accounts. Start with the inside sales support people. Give the account info out to your customers. Now the customer has a direct, immediate, recorded, concurrent, pressence based method to get information about your products or services. They can ask that question while they are working with the product and writting up that email to accounting about paying you a bag of money for it. If that isn’t the bee’s knee’s in customer focused technology, then I don’t know what is.

Aaron Worsham / Apr 9, 2008

Customer Communications 2.0

Lets face it, Business to Business sales is a tight knit world. Your company is usually in a small, well defined industry with a finite number of potential customers. Your customer base, too, has a small number of vendors that they’ve worked with for years and intimately trust (usually). Communication in this small network is very clearly defined.

  1. You, the sales person, have a sales proposal.
  2. You call me, your customers, for chat/meeting/lunch/golf?
  3. We discuss/haggle.
  4. I sign.
  5. You hand off to implementation.
  6. Repeat 3 months later.

The customer can also start the dance with a sales opportunity, but regardless the steps are still the same. Most of this interaction is done over the phone and through email. Both customers and vendors are comfortable with these forms of communication. Used together, email and phone can blend to the perfect ratio of interruption and discretion. We have customer communication pretty much figured out, that is as long as nothing changes.

Its Wednesday, so that must mean things have changed, again. It may sound hyperbolic, but change happens. As a tech analyst in the B2B market, I will say that we seem to have a slower rate of adoption than the consumer markets. Traditional business modes seem to hold on much longer, presumably due to the insular nature of how our industries operate. Eventually, however, the forces that mold the consumer world find their way into the B2B community. I have seen a slow but inevitable adoption of new communication technology in B2B companies in the last few years. Instant Messaging, Blogs, Social Networks, Microblogging. If your customers are using these tools in their business, then you should really pay attention. There may be a new mode of communication forming right before our eyes. The first one there may win the hearts and minds of your B2B industry.

In future posts I will be discussing some of the new ways you can connect with your customers. We will look at when and how to use Instant Messaging appropriately. Next we will take a look at how LinkedIn can help you connect, reconnect, and stay connected to your customer’s colleagues. Lastly, we can dive into web conferencing which is an older idea getting a new lease on life.

Aaron Worsham / Apr 7, 2008

B2B CDN Review – LimeLight

I will be wrapping up the CDN segment today with a look at LimeLight Networks. Limelight’s technology is similar to other CDN’s available on the market. A bit too similar, as they just lost a big patent violation case filed by Akamai. Shares are down since the announcement, and things are looking grim in Arizona. So why are we even talking about them?

Customers: LimeLight has Microsoft, one of the largest clients in the Content Distribution game. The XBOX 360 is a media sponge with a loyal, content craved fan base. When you serve up the largest online market for console games in the US, it means something. So the fact that they just signed last year Sony, the soon to be second largest online console market, gives this company some serious clout. Enough to say that either on their own or though a buy-out, LimeLight will be around in the future.

Their Services: Much like any other CDN, LimeLight offers its customers Content Delivery. This is no different than CacheFly’s service, maybe better situated and built out, but the same offering. Unlike other CDNs, LimeLight also supports a proper Streaming Service for its customers (see previous CacheFly post for reference). It follows up its service with an a-la-carte offering of options in its Custom Service. Here you can dedicate servers and control specific option. These are much needed options in the CDN market. Other players in the market have horizontal offerings that go way beyond what most B2Bs needs for their content. LimeLight is playing in your space.

Having said all that, these are the issues and why I think you are still okay with LimeLight.

The Patent Dispute: According to a PC World article, the patent violation deals with Global Hosting system only and not the CDN portion of their business. The Massachusetts U.S. District Court has ruled that LimeLight did not violate Akamai’s CDN patents, as was originally claimed in the suit, only the global hosting. Long of the short of it is, they have a valid CDN business. Going in with eyes open.

Liquidity: Choosing a CDN parter doesn’t mean you are picking out china patterns together. Content is fluid, easily redirected. Using LimeLight now does not preclude you from moving to someone else in the near future. They use one-year contracts, but those become null in the event of an injunction anyway, so as long as they can meet the terms of the SLA (Service Level Agreement) you have little to worry about.

Personal Take: Litigation aside, this company hits a sweet spot right now. My personal experience with LimeLight is limited, but I have heard good things about their customer service from friends in the biz who use them. Their price points are not published, lending to a more traditional model of molding offerings and prices to individual customers. Numbers that I have seen put simple FLV HTTP progressive downloads under one and a half dollars a Gig. Your mileage may vary. In my opinion that number is competitive. The judgment of $45 million against them is concerning, though an appeal is possible. This company has a $100 million yearly revenue stream and enough major players to continue to run their business. Short on an injunction against what they do today on the CDA side, I think they should be considered a player in the B2B space.

CrunchBase Information
Limelight Networks
Information provided by CrunchBase
« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Sazbean


Sarah Worsham (Sazbean) is a Webgrrl = Solution Architect + Product Management (Computer Engineer * Geek * Digital Strategist)^MBA. All views are her own.

Business + Technical Product Management

My sweet spot is at the intersection between technology and business. I love to manage and develop products, market them, and deep dive into technical issues when needed. Leveraging strategic and creative thinking to problem solving is when I thrive. I have developed and marketed products for a variety of industries and companies, including manufacturing, eCommerce, retail, software, publishing, media, law, accounting, medical, construction, & marketing.

Copyright © 2008 - 2026 Sazbean • All rights reserved.