Dec
03
2009

Is Spam Ruining Personal Connections on Twitter?

relationshipwroteWe’ve all received them – automated DMs (direct messages) on Twitter for all sorts of things – to say hi, to sell a product, to get you to join their mafia family, whatever.  They’re all spam.  I tend to use DMs to send personal messages to people – to say hi, or send a thank you – things that are nicer to send personally than publicly.  Recently I’ve received quite a few messages from people telling me that they don’t check their DMs, so they missed my messages. Are all these automated messages/spam ruining the ability to personally connect with people?

I admit that I get a lot of spam in my DMs as well, but it’s not that hard to filter through them using an application like TweetDeck or Tweetie.  Even Twitter’s website makes it relatively easy to scan through a list of tweets to see if there’s anything of value.  I actually have any DMs emailed to me as well.  Why?  Because I don’t want to miss any important messages.

Maybe DMs are going the way of email – where we don’t read much of it because there’s a low ratio of content-to-spam.  But we all do get good email messages – ones that are very important – is the same true of DMs?  Or is the content-to-spam ratio much lower?

What do you think?  Do you use DMs to send personal messages to people?  Do you monitor DMs?  How do you monitor them?

(photo by Wrote @ Flickr CC)

Liked this post? Consider subscribing to Sazbean.com through RSS feed or by email or following us on Twitter.

Technorati tags: ,

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • http://www.vincentroman.com Vincent Roman

    Personally I feel like a very clunky interface is killing personal connections on Twitter. With over 200+ people I follow its nigh on impossible to organise them. The interface in Tweetdeck alone sucks. No one thinks of simplicity.

    If i get spams, direct messages or not, I either unfollow or I politely tell the friend to stop killing my twitter experience, and if they can't be bothered I unfollow them.

    What I hate is the creatives at agencies, who wouldn't want the kind of DM spam you talk of happening to them, but thinking it is ok for others to do it to their friends. Had a recent case like this with FB connect.

  • http://sazbean.com sazbean

    I agree about the interface problems. Although I'm able to follow conversations fairly well but it requires using Groups in TweetDeck. From mobile, I usually use Tweetie – so I'll follow mentions and DMs but not necessarily the full stream. I think a lot of people get overwhelmed by the full stream so I'm sure we'll see even more filtering to make things bearable.

    People should practice what they preach (and vice versa) – that's probably true of just about anything.

  • http://www.vincentroman.com Vincent Roman

    Personally I feel like a very clunky interface is killing personal connections on Twitter. With over 200+ people I follow its nigh on impossible to organise them. The interface in Tweetdeck alone sucks. No one thinks of simplicity.

    If i get spams, direct messages or not, I either unfollow or I politely tell the friend to stop killing my twitter experience, and if they can't be bothered I unfollow them.

    What I hate is the creatives at agencies, who wouldn't want the kind of DM spam you talk of happening to them, but thinking it is ok for others to do it to their friends. Had a recent case like this with FB connect.

  • http://sazbean.com sazbean

    I agree about the interface problems. Although I'm able to follow conversations fairly well but it requires using Groups in TweetDeck. From mobile, I usually use Tweetie – so I'll follow mentions and DMs but not necessarily the full stream. I think a lot of people get overwhelmed by the full stream so I'm sure we'll see even more filtering to make things bearable.

    People should practice what they preach (and vice versa) – that's probably true of just about anything.